March 18, 2015
(h/t: Exploring Our Matrix)
October 15, 2014
September 10, 2014
July 9, 2014
(h/t: The Episcopal Church Memes Facebook page)
May 14, 2014
I was on holidays for a week and didn’t have a chance to check back on AtheismTV‘s website until today, and BAM! There it was!
(I skipped ahead through the announcements. I trust that no one will mind.)
The sound quality and lighting are unfortunate, but that’s the price we paid for an affordable space that could seat the number of people who came (and we quite filled up – if I recall correctly, we had about 100 people turn out to a non-religious event about Jesus on a Saturday night, which is a miracle in itself!).
I’ve already posted my initial impressions of the event, and I haven’t had a chance to re-watch with the ability to pause and look up claims/references so I don’t have much to add now. If you have a chance to watch it, though, I’d be very interested in hearing your impressions of the debate.
This was a fantastic event, and I would like to thank CFI-Ottawa for supporting my odd little hobbies and for not backing away slowly with widened eyes when I propose these sorts of events. You guys are wonderful! And very very tolerant! While included under the organizational heading, I would also like to specially thank all the volunteers who worked like Clydesdales to make this happen. I know a lot of you are nervous about your names getting out in cyber-space, but you know who you are and you know how much I appreciate you.
May 14, 2014
A common question asked by atheists is “why did Jesus need to suffer?” From an outsider perspective, it doesn’t seem to make much sense. The sins committed by humanity were sins only because God made them so (at least if you believe that good is defined by God, rather than existing independently), so it would follow that it was within God’s power to simply forgive them if that was his intention. Yet he decided to torture an innocent bystander instead. Then comes the twist – the bystander was actually himself! So he wore a hair shirt to punish himself so that he could forgive someone else.
It’s all very odd.
This Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal proposes a slightly more understandable motive:
April 30, 2014
A while ago, Jeff Carter posted about the difficulty in taking the gospel account as the story is actually presented, without reading our own assumptions into it. Specifically, the fact that Jesus would have been – being from Nazareth – a “redneck.”
I have to be careful when reading the gospels because I have a tendency to imagine Jesus as being intellectual, and sophisticated, as being at the same time urbane and uncouth – a sort of 1st century hipster, too cool for those in power. In my unguarded moments I imagine Jesus like this because this is how I like think of myself.
The post is very short and worth reading. Carter concludes that he may well have been among those who would have been blinded by prejudice. It’s something of a lesson in how we associate things like dialect/accent with intelligence, even though there’s really no reason to do so.
April 6, 2014
Crook was delightful, as always. I hadn’t heard Carrier speak before, but he was quite good as well. A little snarky at times (though far less so than in his blog), but the material was interesting enough to get through that.
One of my pet peeves in debates, generally, is that the person who machine-gun fires the most nonsense tends to come out looking like the winner. To get around that, we the speakers share their notes ahead of time. The result was absolutely perfect, exactly what I wanted to see! Even better, in fact! Both speakers seemed to work together to lay the groundwork for the subject, and then both were fully prepared (with slides!) to address their “opponent’s” arguments during the rebuttal section.
The chemistry between the two speakers was very friendly, very respectful. They both seemed to approach the question from the idea that there isn’t a whole lot of evidence to work with and that it’s a legitimate debate to have, simply differing on which data points to give more weight to and how to interpret their meaning. Coming out of it, I have a lot more respect for the mythicist position (Carrier’s form of it, anyway – even he admitted that the bulk of the position’s proponents are dogmatic to an extreme. I believe the word used was “crazy”).
Unfortunately, I was doing the time-keeping, so I wasn’t able to take notes. There was a lot of evidence presented, on both side, that I’d like to be able to evaluate when I have the sources (and time) at my disposable. Thankfully, the AtheismTV team was there to film the debate, and should be posting the footage to their YouTube channel within the next couple weeks. I’ll post it as soon as I see it.
It was all round a magnificent event. I had so much fun that it took eons to fall asleep when I got home, I just just too buzzed from all the excitement.
EDIT: The video is now online!